Sunday, June 9, 2013

LOGIC in CAT- the last post..

Through my last two articles about CAT , I have realised that I haven't been able to help you all much with what I learned . I have drawn that conclusion from the response which I have recieved.
So I will be posting one last article as I promised on Importance of Logic.After this I might want to use this blog space for personal use, though I am not sure about the extent.

Anyway , Let me start.

If I tell you that it is not necessary to master both verbal and quant for CAT , will you believe me?
If I tell you that just one section can help you cross the line , will you believe me?
Well , it is true that one section out of verbal and maths is enough for you to get a call from the IIMs but you need to master just one thing along with your favourite section and that is LOGIC.
I will talk from my point of view in the following paragraph.

I was good with the verbal section but maths was a tough nut to crack for me and as the D day of CAT came closer , my worries ,related to handling of the quant section, skyrocketed.In this scenario I took shelter under LOGIC. I realised that if I remove the 20 questions of pure maths from the quant section and 20 questions of pure English from the verbal section , I am left with 20 questions. 20 out of 60 questions which do not require formulas, just logical thinking and mental maths.
Now consider this scenario (Purely hypothetical):

CAT has witnessed that a score of 90-120/180 can help a candidate score a percentile in the range of 96-100.

Now if you are good with one section say English then out of 20 questions , you can answer 12-13 question: 13*3=39 marks (subtract 3-4 marks which are incorrect) :: 35 marks

In your weak section , say quant, if you get 5-6 questions correct out of 20  then : 6*3=18 marks (subtract 4-5 marks for incorrect) :: 14 marks

Sum total:: 49 marks.

Out of the 20 direct questions of logic (10 Data Interpretation and 10 Logical Reasoning) if you can get 16-17 correct then : 16*3=48 ( subtract 1-2 incorrect) :: 46 marks

Sum total:: 95 marks , expected percentile range(depending on the normalization) = 96.5-98

So you attempted around 43-44 questions out of 60 (70 percent ) and got a very good percentile and you didn't even have to master both the sections , just your favourite section plus logic and average knowledge of you weak section.

Now how to improve your logic.So start from the very basic as you still have 4 good months in your hand,I started in july and yet was able to make it my strong point by mid august, so you have to start with the building blocks.Start solving puzzle books(George J. Summer's puzzles and teasers), start solving sudoku( for those who do good , those who don't like me let me tell you that 2-3 weeks of sudoku made me think faster ) and most importantly start solving previous years DI and LR questions espcly of IIFT and CAT as they are really helpful. No need to solve Arun sharma or any other book , previous years , a book of puzzles , sudoku , and some games on word power and riddles and mental maths (like quick addition,subtraction and approximate multiplication) are more than enough to make your brain work faster and get you closer to those illuminations while solving questions.


Precaution: I do not promote or motivate leaving aside one section or not working hard on your weakness, if you are a determinant soul then put in extra hours, solve as much as you can , get your basics right beause only a balanced sectionals can make you cross the big 98+ percentile mark and I literally have not seen anyone who has a great variation in his/her sections get coveted calls from the top management colleges.
This post is only to make you realise the importance of logic in this exam and how much it can help you by improving your score with no prior learned formulas or concepts.
Also it is high time you start thinking about time management and section management and hence start strategising and this post can help you formulating your strategies around the "4" sections if I may say so.

I lost yet I won...

What does one do when sitting idle in his summer holidays with practically not much on the mind.He thinks about various things,diverse things, phrases , quotes , advertisements seem to fiddle with his mind.Something similar happened to me , happens to me and one particular quote which has been the epitome of our regional cinema "kyunki haar ke jeetne ko baazigar kehte hain". A TV commercial has made me think as the commercial revolves around the quote " jab mera beta mujhko haraega , main jeet jaaungi".Interesting isn't it? Wondering what? Let me try to put forward a view point.

When I think about a goal there are always two things that are arguably the concerns of many, Winning or Losing.Does one talk about a goal having two points of win and loss? A goal can either be won or lost then how can one lose yet win it? Is there a hint of a goal residing in another like a nested goal? Let me talk about it a bit more.

When we talk about a nested goal then we should achieve both the goals. Yes?
If no, then explain to yourself why would one want to lose? To help someone else? For some sort of inner peace? To create an opportunity to win something bigger and more important?
In doing all this isn't he/she ultimately achieving something or winning something for himself/herself finally? If he/she is then why say " I lost to win something?" .

Loss is when someone who wants to achieve something , some goal and he/she is not able to achieve it.That is loss, right?
How can one loss something that he/she never wanted to achieve?
For example : A coach trains a player and one day he/she beats his/her coach so did the coach lost yet won by making his/her apprentice better than him/her? I don't think so.The coach simply achieved his goal and hence won , there wasn't really a loss.Was there?

The so called loss was never really a loss beacause one never wanted to win it.He/she didn't consider it a goal which he/she was after. It was something else and this so called "loss" paved way for the victory or achievement of a goal which many would call "the ultimate victory" , "the actual victory"
so why the farce of saying " I lost to win" .